Postcards to Legislators
 
First Card sent September 13
Second Card sent September 20
Third Card sent September 27
Fourth Card sent October 4
Fifth Card sent October 12
Sixth Card sent October 18
Seventh Card sent October 25
Eighth Card sent November 1
Ninth Card sent November 8
Tenth Card sent November 15
Eleventh Card sent November 22
Twelvth Card sent November 29
Thirteenth Card sent December 20
Fourteenth Card sent December 27
Fifteenth Card sent January 3
Sixteenth Card sent January 10
Seventeenth Card sent January 13
And the reactions are comin' in!
 

Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 20 |
 

Each week we'll send a postcard to each of South Dakota's 70 State Representatives and 35 State Senators, as well as to Governor Janklow, Lt.-Gov. Carole Hillard, Attorney-General Mark Barnett, various South Dakota and national periodicals, and several other folks besides.

Each card will contain a bit of the truth about psychoactive substances and a bit of a refutation of the government's position on the so-called war on drugs in general, as well as the war on hemp in particular.

And always, always, there will be the challenge: Mt Rushmore State NORML will pay anyone $1000.00 if he/she/they can show one beneficial accomplishment of a century of governmental wars against God-given herbs. One beneficial accomplishment of about 30 years of unprecedented barbarism practiced by a police state against its citizenry. Please, please, take us to court on this one.

After about twenty such cards, some of South Dakota's elected officials, at that point armed with better information, might be more inclined to do the right thing in the 2000 session (starts in January) than some of them may have been willing to do in the past, given the bad information they've been handed for a long time by people they should not have trusted.

Below is the text which appears on the first of these cards. Check back once a week for successive cards. We welcome your input as to content of the cards, and your help, either with money or with labor (mailing labelers needed).

September 13, 1999

Dear South Dakota Legislator:

 

This is the first in what I hope will be a series of weekly messages about the so-called drug war in general, and about hemp (marijuana) in particular. There might come a time in the 2000 legislative session when some of what you will learn from these mailings will be of value to you as you attempt to do the right thing by your constituents.

You might begin by noting that this card is printed on 100% hemp paper--imported, of course, since state (and federal) law precludes growing hemp for ANY purpose, including any of the over 60,000 industrial uses which have been documented for it.

Hemp can be used for any purpose to which trees, cotton, or petroleum have been put. Usually, hemp products are better, more efficient and cheaper than products made from other sources.

Hemp is much more environmentally-friendly than, say, farming corn for bio-mass, or, say, farming trees for paper pulp. If South Dakota farmers were allowed to grow hemp for paper alone, not another tree would ever have to be cut in the Black Hills for pulp. The inevitably-resultant processing plant would provide new well-paying jobs.

Until next week: I recommend The Emperor Wears No Clothes ($29.95: AH HA Publishing; P.O. Box 13549; Austin, Texas 78711),<www.jackherer.com>; and Drug Crazy: How We Got into this Mess, and How We Can Get Out, by Mike Gray (Random House, $23.95), <www.drugcrazy.com>.

 

Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML

 

Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |

September 20, 1999

Dear South Dakota Legislator:

 

In this week's message, NORML's Mt. Rushmore State Chapter poses two questions.

1. Under what constitutional authority have ANY laws been passed to limit production, use or sale of ANY pyschoactive substances ("drugs")? (Hint: There is none.)

2. Of what benefit to us have ANY laws been, which restrict production, use or sale of ANY psychoactive substances ("drugs")? (Hint: See last hint.) 

The "drug" laws have accomplished many things. Among them are: higher drug use overall; steadily lower ages of first experimentation; massive corruption in law enforcement and government; violence in our streets; higher murder rates; higher burglary and theft rates; higher taxes; more people in prison; destabilization of every government south of us in this hemisphere; and more availability of drugs than ever.

(See <http://www.nakedgov.com/accomplish.htm>)

But the drug laws have accomplished nothing of value.

If you -- or anyone -- can provide an example of a single beneficial accomplishment of the so-called "war on drugs", Mt. Rushmore State Chapter of NORML will pay $1000 to the recipient of your choice.

Until next week, you might want to read Shattered Lives: Portraits from America's Drug War (Creative Xpressions; PO Box 1716; El Cerrito CA 94530; 510-215-8326) <www.hr95.org>.

Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML

 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |

September 27, 1999

Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
What kind of monster have we been fighting for 30 years in the "war on drugs"? What dangers have been worth the expenditure of 500 billion dollars, the imprisonment of millions of people, and the ruination by government of tens of millions of lives?
 
Here is a breakdown of annual deaths in the United States from several drugs. The numbers come from various sources, and are by their nature hard to pin down exactly, but agree in general with those of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Office of National Drug Control Policy.
 
Tobacco: about 390,000.
Cocaine: about 2,200.
Heroin: about 2,000.
Aspirin: about 2,000.
Caffeine from coffee: about 5000.
Alcohol: about 150,000 (not counting 50% of all highway deaths or 65% of all murders).
Unforeseen side effects from prescription drugs administered by gov't-approved doctors: about 125,000
 
 
Hemp (marijuana) kills 0. Never in history has there been a death due to ingestion of marijuana. The only deaths due to hemp are those of people shot by cops prosecuting the drug war.
 
All illegal drugs combined kill about 4,500 people per year, or less than one percent of the number killed by alcohol and tobacco. Tobacco kills more people each year than all of the people killed by all illegal drugs in this century.
 
See <http://www.drcnet.org/> for the most complete treatment of drug policy on the net.
 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |

October 4, 1999

Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
THE LEXINGTON (KY) HERALD-LEADER: BUSINESS SECTION: June 25, 1999;
... hemp animal bedding made from the pulp of the stalk.  ... imported from Canada, lasts longer than straw or wood chips and composts faster. ... three times more absorbent than cotton.   "... began selling hemp oil 2 years ago, and the products now account for 10% of sales," Roddick said. She imports 12 tons of hemp seed oil a year....
 
THE INTELLIGENCER-JOURNAL: Lancaster, Pennsylvania; April 7, 1999;
... sinking prices for corn, soybeans and tobacco, the time is ripe to consider hemp, according to Farm Bureau president Jane Balmer.   ... a crop grown here for over 200 years, providing textiles, food, oil and paper. "At a return of over $700 an acre ...."  ...in 1850, Lancaster Co. was growing 540 tons of hemp, the same amount imported into the US in 1996. "... you wonder: Why did we ever give this up?"
 
Bismarck, ND - Apr. 17, 1999; Gov. Schafer signed HB 1428 legalizing industrial hemp.
 
The Pacific Business News: Honolulu, Hawaii; July 12, 1999; Governor Cayetano this week approved House Bill 22, legalizing cultivation of industrial hemp.
 
Sacramento: Sep. 10, 1999; California Assembly House Res. 32, which calls on the state to consider changing the legal status of industrial hemp to allow for its cultivation, was approved today.
 
June 4, 1999: Minnesota third state to pass industrial hemp legislation
 
July 10, 1999: Springfield, Illinois -- Illinois passes legislation to study hemp production
 
Prohibition works great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself. It goes beyond the bounds of reason. It attempts to control man's appetite by legislation and makes crimes of things which are not crimes. Prohibition laws strike a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.  

--Abraham Lincoln

 
Very best regards;        Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
October 11, 1999
Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
I believe that every individual is naturally entitled to do as he pleases with himself and the fruits of his labor, so far as it in no way interferes with any other men's rights. --Abraham Lincoln
(All statistics from South Dakota Dept. of Corrections website.)
 
The South Dakota Department of Corrections budget for Fiscal 1999 is $48,290,000.
DOC statement of cost per year to imprison a woman: $14,600; a man in Sioux Falls: $12,775; a man in Springfield: $10,220. Costs for juveniles are not listed, but probably at least equal those for adults.
 
Total adults now imprisoned: Men, 2309; Women, 204; Total 2513.
Total juveniles now imprisoned: Male, 359; Female, 83; Total 442. (Breakdown for type of violation not listed)
 
Total incarceration costs for all imprisoned people: about $35,460,000 (at an ave. annual cost of $12000 per person).
The balance of the DOC budget, about $13,000,000, is probably for Pardons and Paroles (P&P figures not given).
 
Adults imprisoned for controlled substance violations: Men, 222; Women, 36; Total 258.
For hemp (marijuana) violations: Men, 50; Women, 4; Total 54. For drug-free zone violations: Men, 8.
 
Total annual cost of adult imprisonment for all drug violations: About $3,840,000.
Total annual cost of adult imprisonment for hemp violations: about $672,000.
 
Estimated cost for juvenile imprisonment for all drug violations (if the percentage is about the same for juveniles as for adults, i.e. 13%): about $689,520. For hemp violations: about $106,080.
 
Est. cost of Pardons and Paroles supervision of all drug "criminals": $1,690,000. Of all hemp "criminals": $33,800.
 
Decriminalization of all "drugs" would save SD taxpayers about $6,219,000 annually in imprisonment costs alone, not to mention law enforcement/welfare costs. Decriminalization of hemp would save about $812,000 annually, not to mention the money wasted on enforcing hemp laws, and the resources wasted when the breadwinner of a family goes to prison and the family goes on welfare.
 
Useless laws weaken the necessary laws. --Montesquieu
 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
October 18, 1999
 
Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
Want to slash illegal drug use by 77%? Decriminalize hemp (marijuana).
 
According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), nearly 70 million Americans have smoked marijuana. Of these, 18 million have smoked within the past year, and approximately 10 million are current smokers (defined as having smoked at least once in the last month). In fact, HHS found that 57 percent of all current illicit drug users report that marijuana is the only illegal drug they have used; this figure rises to 77 percent if hashish (pressed hemp resin) is included. --Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Preliminary Estimates from 1995 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (Wash., DC: U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, 1996), pp. 56-60.
 
34% -- one third of the voting adults in the country -- acknowledged having smoked marijuana at some point in their lives. --ACLU, Nat'l Survey of Voters' Opinions on Use & Legalization of Marijuana (April 5, 1995).
 
Stop punishing responsible hemp (marijuana) users.
 
I personally know over 200 business owners and jobholders who use hemp illegally on a fairly regular basis, and still do their jobs. This includes bankers, lawyers, prosecutors, judges, doctors, nail drivers, concrete finishers, cops, car dealers, store owners, and legislators (note plural).
 
It's time to reflect that reality in our state and federal legislation, and stop acting as if marijuana smokers are part of the crime problem. They are not, and it is absurd to continue spending limited law enforcement resources arresting them.
 
 
"Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man."

--Francis L. Young; Administrative Law Judge: Drug Enforcement Administration (1988)

 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
October 25, 1999
Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
Prohibition was introduced as a fraud; it has been nursed as a fraud. It is wrapped in the livery of Heaven, but it comes to serve the devil. It comes to regulate by law our appetites and our daily lives. It comes to tear down liberty and build up fanaticism, hypocrisy, and intolerance. It comes to confiscate by legislative decree the property of many of our fellow citizens. It comes to send spies, detectives, and informers into our homes; to have us arrested and carried before courts and condemned to fines and imprisonments. It comes to dissipate the sunlight of happiness, peace, and prosperity in which we are now living and to fill our land with alienations, estrangements, and bitterness.
 
It comes to bring us evil --only evil-- and that continually. Let us rise in our might as one and overwhelm it with such indignation that we shall never hear of it again as long as grass grows and water runs.
(From an 1887 speech by Roger Q. Mills of Texas; quoted more than once during the alcohol prohibition debates in Congress. He proved to be a prophet, as the years 1918-1933 taught us. We're learning the truth of this prophecy again in the so-called "war on drugs".)
 
Four in 10 violent crimes involve alcohol, according to the crime victim, as do four in 10 fatal motor vehicle accidents. Four in 10 criminal offenders report that they were using alcohol at the time of their offense. Two-thirds of the violent crime victims who were attacked by an intimate --a current or former spouse or boyfriend or girlfriend-- report that alcohol had been a factor.

(US Dept. of Justice statistics)

 
There is no link between hemp (marijuana) and violence, or any crime except its own presence.
 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
=============================================================
For text of previous postcards to legislators, see
<http://www.nakedgov.com/postcard1.htm>
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
November 1, 1999
Dear South Dakota Legislator;
 
In Salem, Massachusetts, in 1692, an outbreak of "witchcraft" occurred. Witches were purported to exhibit their affliction by antisocial behavior -- including blasphemous speech, appearing to be in a trance-like state, and indoctrination of children into witchcraft.
 
Witch-spotters were employed, able to discern a witch using a profile including physical and social traits and patterns. A witch had identifying marks, discovery of which required shaving of body hair to disclose the body to prosecutors. Witch-spotters often operated as a private enterprise, travelling from town to town offering their services for profit.
 
Denying their guilt, accused witches were placed under heavy stones for however long it took them to confess, accuse others, or die. After confessing or being convicted in trial, witches were hanged. Those who questioned the existence and/or the definitions of witchcraft, the profiling methods, or the penalties were often also hanged as witches.
 
In South Dakota, in 1999, an outbreak of "drug abuse" has existed for more than thirty years, according to government. Drug abusers are purported to exhibit their affliction by antisocial behavior -- including blasphemous speech, appearing to be in trance-like states, and indoctrination of children into drug abuse.
 
Drug-abuse spotters are employed, purportedly able to discern drug abusers by a profile including physical and social traits and patterns. Such spotters, often criminals, are employed by law enforcement agencies. Some travel from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, offering their services for profit. Law enforcement agencies frequently examine the bare bodies of suspected drug abusers, looking for identifying marks and probing their body orifices.
 
Denying their guilt, suspected drug abusers are often placed under the weight of heavy lists of accusations until they either confess, accuse others, or are sent to government facilities to be further tortured. After confessing or being convicted in trial, they are either relieved of their personal possessions, sent to government facilities for torture, or both. Those who question the government's definitions, profiles, discovery tactics, or penalties are often accused of being drug abusers or sympathizers thereof, and often suffer the same fates.
 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: November 8, 1999
 
According to SD Unified Judicial System statistics, from July 1, 1998 to June 30, 1999, there were 5388 arrests for "drug" violations under SDCL 22-42. Of these, 3606 arrests were for marijuana violations, and 1782 were for other drug violations. One arrest every 100 minutes.
 
These arrests resulted in 2751 convictions -- 1849 for marijuana, 902 for other drugs.
 
What's going on!
 
Why are fully half of all drug arrests resulting in no conviction for the charges? I submit that the arresting officers had all the evidence (the offending substance itself) needed in at least 95% of these cases. Without that, almost certainly the drug charge would not have been preferred.
 
Illegal searches probably accounted for some cases being dropped, but not a large percentage.
 
In most cases, the accused first drew an officer's attention because (s)he was doing something else suspicious or illegal. The prosecutor then dropped the drug charge in return for a guilty plea on, say, DWI or petty theft or something. In more than a few cases, the accused drug possessor simply gave the cops someone else to arrest on a "more substantial" drug charge, in return for absolution.
 
One in every 134 South Dakotans was arrested on a drug charge last year. Assuming that almost all arrests had some basis, then how many South Dakotans actually possessed and used illicit drugs in that time period? Does law enforcement catch and arrest one in ten users? One in 20? Can it be that one in 13 South Dakotans used illicit drugs last year? Or one in seven?
If 10% of the population is ignoring the law, what does that say about the law? My personal observation suggests that 10% is close to the actual figure. If drugs create other crime, where is the havoc being wrought by these 72,000 drug-crazed maniacs? Why are half of those arrested not convicted? Are the drug laws simply window dressing, leverage, or money extractors? All bad. No good. Get rid of them.
 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: November 15, 1999
 
The international illicit drug business generates about $400 billion annually according to the World Drug Report, commissioned by the United Nations International Drug Control Program. That amounts to 8% of all international trade, comparable to annual turnover in textiles.
About 140 million people -- nearly 2.5% of the world's population -- smoke marijuana.

Associated Press, "U.N. Estimates Drug Business Equal to 8 Percent of World Trade," (1997, June 26)

 
Marijuana was first federally prohibited in 1937. Today, nearly 70 million Americans admit to having tried it. 10 million ADMIT to smoking it regularly.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (1997)

 
Commissioned by Pres. Nixon in 1972, the Nat'l Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse concluded that "Marihuana's potential for harm to individual users and its impact on society doesn't justify a policy designed to seek out and punish those who use it. This judgment is based on prevalent use patterns, on behavior exhibited by the vast majority of users and on our interpretations of existing medical and scientific data. This position also is consistent with the estimate by law enforcement personnel that the elimination of use is unattainable."

Shafer, R. P., et al, "Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding": Nat'l Comm. on Marihuana & Drug Abuse, (1972)

 
84% of the increase in state and federal prison admissions since 1980 is accounted for by nonviolent (mostly drug) offenders.

Ambrosio, T. & Schiraldi, V., Executive Summary--Feb. 1997, Washington D.C.: The Justice Policy Institute

 
The United States operates the biggest [read "most expensive"] prison system on Earth.

Currie, E., Crime and Punishment in America, New York, NY: (1998)

 
Very best regards; Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: November 22, 1999
 
Lakota tribal wisdom says that when you discover you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount. However, in organizations like governments and bureaucracies, we often try other strategies. These can include any or all of the following:
 
  • Buying a stronger whip.
  • Changing riders.
  • Saying things like "this is the way we always have ridden this horse".
  • Appointing a committee to study the horse.
  • Visiting other sites to see how they ride dead horses.
  • Increasing the standards to ride dead horses.
  • Appointing a team to revive the dead horse.
  • Training sessions to increase our riding ability.
  • Comparing the state of dead horses in today's environment.
  • Passing a resolution declaring that "this horse is not dead".
  • Harnessing several dead horses together for increased efficiency.
  • Blaming the horse's parents.
  • Declaring that, "No horse is too dead to beat."
  • Providing additional funding to increase the horse's performance.
  • Doing a study to see if contractors can ride it cheaper.
  • Declaring the dead horse "better, faster, and cheaper".
  • Forming a quality circle to find uses for dead horses.
  • Revisiting the performance requirements for horses.
  • Saying this horse was procured with cost as an independent variable.
  • Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position.
  • Criticizing all who dare to observe that the horse is dead.
All of these tacks are being taken in the so-called "war on drugs".
 
Happy Thanksgiving!
 
Very best regards, Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: November 29, 1999
 
The cannabis plant, from which is derived a euphoriant known as marijuana, and from which is derived over 60000 industrial products, also has been demonstrated to provide medically-effective treatments for a variety of afflictions.
Among these are treatments for: glaucoma, migraine headaches, facial neuralgia, hypertension, depression, epilepsy, anxiety, convulsions, symptoms of a wide variety of infectious diseases, and the pain, nausea and loss of appetite caused by radiation- and chemo-therapy for cancer. In addition, it has been shown to be a mild general anasthetic and an antibiotic (germ-killer).
 
Much information about this marvelous herb can be found at <http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/> on the Internet. This is a huge resource, with documentation of all aspects of the harm caused by the so-called "war on drugs".
 
Pres. Nixon's 1972 Nat'l. Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse documented most of these therapeutic uses. Nixon's crew, though, discounted all complimentary information about the cannabis plant, as did Drug Czar McCaffrey's gang in 1999 to the Institute of Medicine report, which McCaffrey had commissioned.
 
Current national policy prevents even research on these possible and probable benefits from the most versatile plant God ever created. Willful ignorance on the part of politicians denies millions of people the relief from pain and misery which could be obtained from the cannabis plant. Willful stupidity on the part of the news media continues to support this travesty. South Dakota politicians continue to willfully ignore these benefits as well, in their continued support of the counter-productive federal policies.
 
Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. --Francis L. Young, Administrative Law Judge: Drug Enforcement Administration (1988)
 
Very best regards, Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter--NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
December 20, 1999
 
Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
Hello again. We missed sending the last two weeks' postcards due to funerals and flus.
 
As we move through the Christmas and New Year's seasons, we thought it would be nice to contemplate some nice gifts you, as legislators, could give to South Dakotans.
 
Wouldn't it be wonderful if sick people who need the well-established medical benefits of cannabis could legally obtain these benefits in South Dakota, as they can in some other states?
 
Wouldn't it be great if South Dakota farmers who would like to grow the most versatile plant in the world -- for clothing, fuel, and building materials -- could do so legally?
 
Wouldn't it be pleasant if, by strokes of his pen in signing medical and industrial hemp bills you pass, Governor Janklow would say "NO!" to the current violence, crime, and unfettered access of children to marijuana now endorsed by state policies?
 
Wouldn't it be nice for the taxpayers to be able to stop funding the corruption of police officers caused by the current drug laws, and to stop feeding and lodging -- in prison -- harmless people whose only crime is attempting to feel better?
 
Wouldn't it be terrific to see new textile, fuel, and building materials industries establish, grow and thrive in South Dakota's new atmosphere of enlightened awareness of the thousands and thousands of benefits -- already well-documented -- which re-legalization of the hemp plant will bring to our state?
 
We in the Mount Rushmore State Chapter of NORML wish all of you and your families a Merry Christmas and the very best for the coming year.
 
Very best regards, Bob Newland; Chair: Mt Rushmore State Chapter --NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
December 27, 1999
 
Dear South Dakota Legislator:
 
 
This act was passed by the North Dakota Legislature and signed by the governor during the 1999 session. Minnesota and Hawaii have passed similar bills. Hawaii just planted a test plot.
 
NORTH DAKOTA INDUSTRIAL HEMP BILL (56th Legislative Assembly of North Dakota)
 
HOUSE BILL NO. 1428 -- Introduced by: Representatives Monson, R. Kelsch, Nichols; Senators Heitkamp, D. Mathern, Thane
 
A BILL for an Act to authorize the production of industrial hemp.
 
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NORTH DAKOTA:
 
Industrial hemp - Cannabis sativa - Oilseed. Industrial hemp, cannabis sativa, having no more than three-tenths of one percent tetrahydracannibol, is recognized as an oilseed. Any person in this state may plant, grow, harvest, possess, process, sell, and buy industrial hemp, cannabis sativa having no more than three-tenths of one percent tetrahydracannibol.
 
North Dakota Legislative Website: http://ranch.state.nd.us/LR/text/JBFM0700.pdf
 
Very best regards,
Bob Newland; Chair:
Mt Rushmore State Chapter --NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: January 3, 1999
 
Hemp can save troubled South Dakota farms. Not all, but certainly some. It is simply insane to continue to deny this option to South Dakota farmers.
We have everything we need -- water, power, and great hemp-growing soil and climate -- to become the first state to build a thriving seed-to-useable-product hemp industry.
Hemp lasts longer and is stronger than wood or cotton. Hemp clothing is warmer in winter, cooler in summer than cotton. Hemp seed and oil are more nutritious even than soybeans, and easier to grow.
Hemp-product manufacturing is dramatically cleaner than that for all products it could replace, such as paper, cloth, building materials, and fuel. Its cultivation requires dramatically less toxic chemicals.
Hemp cultivated and harvested for industrial uses is not intoxicating. In fact, cross-pollination from it would reduce the intoxication potential of marijuana grown nearby.
South Dakota could become the hemp capital of America (the world, perhaps) supplying manufacturers and retailers with raw materials and products now imported -- to the tune of $100 Million -- from Canada, Hungary, China and 27 other countries. The desirability of hemp products will increase this market in a steep curve for some time as hemp becomes more available and its products less expensive due to competition and lowered manufacturing costs. Some estimate the worldwide market for hemp products at in excess of $500 Billion.
Hemp has over 60,000 practical, industrial, and medical uses. Why don't we in South Dakota capitalize on the need and demand for this amazing, environmentally-friendly, and profitable plant? It is stupid to import hemp products from other countries. There are NO reasons not to grow it here, and many reasons to do so.
 
Very best regards,
Bob Newland; Chair:
Mt Rushmore State Chapter --NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: January 10, 1999
 
It's a simple, practical, profitable, politically-perfect idea. Let 'em grow hemp!
Here's an idea for a law which will make things better for everyone in South Dakota.
 
Any person in South Dakota, having registered with the Secretary of Agriculture to do so, may plant, harvest, possess, process, sell or buy industrial hemp, cannabis sativa L., with a tetrahydrocannibinol (THC) content of 1% or less. It shall be considered an unintentional violation of this act if some plants exceed 1% THC but do not exceed 3% THC.
North Dakota has a similar law. Hawaii is growing a test plot. Minnesota asked the DEA to reschedule industrial-strength cannabis. Nebraska is considering it now. Montana asked the feds to reschedule it. Canada is growing it and selling it to importers here. The Farm Bureau in 51 states and the National Farm Bureau want their members to be able to grow hemp. There are millions of proponents.
 
There is no chance that this law will increase marijuana use!
You can't get high smoking pot with only 3% THC. If you smoke enough of it you'll get a headache. Industrial hemp cross-pollinates with and reduces the potency of marijuana growing nearby. After learning this last week, a pot-smoking acquaintance called me and said, "Don't do this. They'll ruin the good shit." Do you need to know more?
 
Watch for news of our informational seminar next week in Pierre!
 
Very best regards,
Bob Newland; Chair:
Mt Rushmore State Chapter --NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
Dear South Dakota Legislator: January 13, 1999
 
For Information on Industrial Hemp,
visit with Bob Newland in the Capitol Rotunda on
Tuesday, Jan. 18 from 3 to 5 pm or Friday, Jan. 21 from 2 to 5 pm
 
We intend to introduce the following legislation in the House Agriculture Committee:
(We respectfully request House Leadership to assign it to Agriculture.)
 
Any person in South Dakota, having registered with the Secretary of Agriculture to do so, may plant, harvest, possess, process, sell or buy industrial hemp, cannabis sativa L., with a tetrahydrocannibinol (THC) content of 1% or less. It shall be considered an unintentional violation of this act if some plants exceed 1% THC but do not exceed 3% THC.
 
This is a simple, practical, straightforward opportunity to give South Dakota
farmers another CHOICE in marketing their skills, knowledge and products.
Be Informed. Come visit with someone who knows.
 
There is NO CHANCE that this bill will increase marijuana use in South Dakota.
 
Very best regards,
Bob Newland; Chair:
Mt Rushmore State Chapter --NORML
 
Go to Card # 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
See press releases sent to over 300 news organizations,
including about 100 South Dakota newspapers.
 
 Mt Rushmore State NORML | Govt Wears No Clothes Home | GWNC Sitemap
 
Justice Unlimited