- The Armed Defense of Liberty
- By Dr. Alan Keyes
- July 30, 1999
-
- Despite the heroic efforts of Sen. Bob Smith to turn
it back, the latest batch of irrational and servile
restrictions on the Second Amendment continues to ooze
its way through that allegedly deliberative institution,
the Congress. Perhaps because the gun control debate is
now so entirely drenched in the emotive sludge that is
the principal intellectual food of our political
establishment, this seems a good moment to recall the
deep reasons, the fundamental context, that must inform
any responsible deliberations on the question of an armed
citizenry.
-
- I believe that underlying all of the prominent issues
of the day -- abortion, the breakdown of the family and
of our educational institutions, the betrayal of our
national sovereignty and military readiness, and the
ongoing expansion of government's tyrannical claims to
tax and regulate -- we can discern what is essentially
one moral challenge which manifests itself in many areas.
Simply stated, that challenge has to do with the
corruption of our understanding of freedom, which leads
to the abandonment of respect for law and individual
responsibility, the twin pillars which ought to
under-gird true freedom.
-
- As a free people, our way of life depends upon
certain moral ideas. As a matter of personal conscience,
I believe that Christianity most perfectly embodies those
ideas. But since Americans come from many different
religious backgrounds, in dealing with issues of public
policy, we must derive these ideas from sources that are
open to support from all the people.
-
- Nothing meets this purpose more completely than the
principles and logic of our own Declaration of
Independence, so American citizens and statesmen should
make it the explicit basis for dealing with the moral
crisis we now face.
-
- The Declaration is fundamentally a statement of the
principles of justice that define the moral identity of
the American people. It presents a certain concept of our
human nature and draws out the political consequences of
that concept.
-
- All human beings are created equal. They need no
title or qualification beyond their simple humanity in
order to command respect for their intrinsic human
dignity, their "unalienable rights."
-
- The purpose of government is to secure these rights,
and no government is just or legitimate if it
systematically violates them.
-
- But the Declaration is more than just an assertion of
rights. It also makes a clear statement about the
ultimate source of authority which commands respect for
those rights. God, the Creator, the author of the laws of
nature, is that source.
-
- Thus the effective prerequisite for human rights is
respect for God's authority and His eternal laws. This is
also the prerequisite for the idea of government based
upon consent, which includes free elections,
representation, due process of law, etc.
-
- If we accept the logic of our Declaration of
Independence, this reverence for God is not just a matter
of religious faith. It is the foundation of justice and
citizenship in our republic.
-
- Therefore, our freedom is derived from our respect
for law, especially the highest law as embodied in the
will of the Creator. Thus freedom, rightly understood,
cannot be confused with mere licentiousness. It first of
all involves the duty to respect its own foundations in
the laws of nature and nature's God. That's why our
rights are "unalienable," which means that we do not have
the right to surrender or destroy them by our choice or
actions.
-
- Indeed, if we make the judgment that our rights are
being systematically violated, we have the duty to resist
and overthrow the power responsible. This duty involves
both the judgment and the moral and material capacity to
resist tyranny. These principles constitute our character
as a free people, which it is our duty to maintain.
-
- It is in the context of these principles that we must
understand the purpose of the Second Amendment, and the
duties that it implies. The Founders added the Second
Amendment to the Constitution so that when, after a long
train of abuses, a government evinces a methodical design
upon our natural rights, we will have the means to
protect and recover those rights.
-
- If we make the judgment that our rights are being
systematically violated, we have not merely the right,
but the duty, to resist and overthrow the power
responsible. It is very hard to do this if the government
has all the weapons, something that our Founders and the
generations before and after them knew from repeated and
first-hand experience, as well as from a study of
history. A strong case can be made, therefore, that it is
a fundamental DUTY of the free citizen to keep and bear
arms.
-
- The claim that the Second Amendment is principally
concerned with the maintenance of state militias --
military bodies under the direction and control of state
governments -- is not just historically false, it is also
fundamentally incoherent. It would make no sense
whatsoever to restrict the right to keep and bear arms to
state governments, since the principle on which our
polity is based, as stated in the Declaration, recognizes
that any government, at any level, can become oppressive
of our rights. And we must be prepared to defend
ourselves against its abuses. The gun control movement is
incompatible with the sovereignty of the people, because
it aims to eliminate one of the key material supports of
that sovereignty.
-
- This is not the principal danger of the gun control
movement, however. Perhaps more important than the
physical disarmament the government is attempting is the
moral disarmament that accompanies it. If we accept the
view that the American people cannot be trusted with the
material objects necessary to defend their liberty, we
will surely accept as well the view that the American
people cannot be trusted with liberty itself. Why should
a man who can't be trusted to refrain from murder be
trusted with the much more difficult and morally subtle
task of choosing his leaders responsibly?
-
- The advocates of gun control take as their first
principle that the American people are morally
incompetent creatures of passion. The America they
envision for us is, accordingly, more like a national
24-hour day-care center than a self-governing republic of
free men and women. If we agree to accept this apparently
comfortable arrangement, we will have to check our
citizenship at the door along with our guns.
-
- If, on the other hand, we intend to exercise the
duties of self-government and justice that are our
patrimony as free and rational creatures, then we will
need to think clearly and coherently about securing the
means necessary to do so. We must defend the moral
self-confidence of America by reasserting the capacity of
our people to make the most important decisions and bear
the most important responsibilities themselves. And we
must retain the material means necessary to shoot the
windows out of the national day-care center, if it comes
to that.
-
- Second Amendment rights are sacred because of their
connection to higher rights and higher duties, which are
the very substance of liberty and justice, and to the God
that America has always acknowledged as the source of
both. We cannot surrender our guns without surrendering
the vision of human dignity under God which is our
national soul. The slow erosion of our national
understanding of this fact is continuing in the Congress.
Only a citizenry armed with a clear understanding of what
is at stake can ultimately save us from the civic
imbecility to which the gun control movement leads. By
disarming, we will confess to our government that we no
longer aspire to sovereignty, and wish our rulers to take
up this burden in our stead. We will be signaling with
great clarity that we wish to be comfortable slaves --
and slaves, at least, we will soon become.
-
- The terrible history of the 20th century should make
clear enough that subjection to unlimited government is
not desirable. But a clear and thoughtful examination of
our national principles teaches us also that it is our
duty to shun such servitude. It is our right, and it is
our duty, to remain free.
-
- GWNC
Home | GWNC
Sitemap
|